Category:Mobile software
Category:Mobile security
Category:Nokia
Category:Unofficial Android porting projectsYou can read the original response and more when you follow this link:
But on the surface level, there’s a great deal of information that’s correct in the tweet.
The original information was provided by a US government official who is neither a member of the White House, nor a person in the intelligence community.
The official was responding to an accusation of the “ransom” of a truck, instead of an outright contradiction of a statement made by the intel chief.
The information that the report originated from the intel chief should have been provided to the public with the intel report. It’s the practice of the intel community to provide “unclassified” reports to the president, the National Security Council, and Congress, as a component of the President’s Daily Briefing.
If that’s the case, then someone, somewhere was a part of the process of withholding that information, and they did it maliciously.
There’s a lot of unanswered questions about who is part of the process to “protect the nation”, and why they did it.
I’m also curious as to how the White House can control access to the PDB, but can’t control access to classified intel that a press source is passing around.
I’m suspicious that the White House would be extremely reluctant to have a press source provide something that could potentially be the downfall of an administration official.
We can look forward to finding out more about this issue in the coming days.
Bonus…Q:
Можно ли объявлять статический метод, используя класс
Здравствуйте! Да, я спра ac619d1d87
Related links: